Thursday, December 24, 2015

What is the relationship between crime and substance abuse?


Background

The precise relationship between substance abuse and crime is difficult to define. First, the cultivation, manufacturing, possession, and sale of illicit drugs are each crimes in their own right. This fact is aligned with numerous studies that have connected the propensity of persons who abuse illicit drugs to commit crimes. Similarly, laws dictating the appropriate distribution and consumption of alcoholic beverages exist throughout the United States. While these statutes themselves are often violated, there exists a well-established parallel between abusive alcohol use and criminal behavior.




It is widely accepted that the behavior of persons impaired by illicit drug and alcohol abuse are prone to erratic tendencies, poor judgment, impulsivity, and violence that lends itself to criminal activity. Repeated abuse of alcohol and drugs also decreases the self-control and inhibitions that distinguish criminals from law-abiding citizens.


Data acquired from the prison population in the United States illustrates that a considerable number of criminals and prison inmates were under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or both, when committing offenses of all kinds. According to a 2009 survey of ten metropolitan areas in the United States by the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the number of criminals who tested positive for at least one controlled substance during their arrest was as high as 82 percent in some locales. The most prevalent drugs of choice for arrestees included marijuana, cocaine, heroin, morphine, and methamphetamine.




Crime and Alcohol Abuse

Motor vehicle violations make up the majority of alcohol-related crimes in the United States. The National Partnership on Alcohol Misuse and Crime (NPAMC) reports that more than 1 million Americans are arrested for driving while intoxicated each year, cases that result in 780,000 criminal convictions. NPAMC findings also note that alcohol-related automobile accidents cost taxpayers more than $100 billion in law enforcement expenses annually. A staggering thirteen thousand people die in drunk-driving-related accidents in the United States each year.


While decades of public interest campaigns led by national law enforcement agencies like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and nonprofit organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) and the DUI Foundation have kept the dangers of drunk driving in the public eye, alcohol abuse is also ubiquitous in a wide variety of non-vehicle-related crimes. Domestic violence, underage drinking, and assault are the most frequently occurring non-vehicle-related but alcohol-related crimes in the United States.


While research has uncovered a recurring coexistence between domestic violence and alcohol abuse, not all domestic abusers are alcoholics and not all alcoholics are domestic abusers. A contrary rationale is that while alcohol abuse is regularly a contributing factor in many acts of domestic violence, there also are cases in which alcohol abuse is used as an excuse or an avoidance of accountability by its perpetrators.


There is less scholarly gray area between alcohol use and criminal behavior by underage people. Consumption of alcohol by persons younger than age twenty-one years is itself a commonly perpetrated crime. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), underage drinkers consume 11 percent of all the alcohol consumed in the United States each year, despite the illegality of doing so. CDC data also indicate that underage alcohol abuse leads to higher rates of school absence and reckless sexual behavior, and to brain development and memory problems.


Like their adult counterparts, abusive underage drinkers also have a higher propensity to violate laws against drunk driving and to engage in or be victimized by physical assault. The risk of criminal behavior appears to follow underage drinkers into adulthood, according to a 2011 study by the University of Miami that linked abusive underage alcohol consumption with a greater probability of committing property crimes like theft or predatory crimes like assault later in adulthood.


A 2008 report by the Pew Center on the States reported that more than 5 million incarcerated adults were drinking at the time of committing their offense, a group that constitutes 36 percent of the entire US prison population. The research also showed trends indicating that the more violent a crime, the more likely alcohol was involved.




Crime and Drug Abuse

Drug-related offenses are broken down into three categories by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA): drug possession and sales, offenses committed to support preexisting drug abuse, and drug-related involvement in criminal activities not related to drugs. In 2011, thirty-one thousand people were arrested in the United States on federal drug charges. The US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) arrests more than twenty-six thousand people for possession each year, and has done so every year since 1986.


A majority of illicit drug abusers rely on petty crimes to support their habit. These crimes range from petty theft to burglary to grand theft auto. Data from the US Bureau of Justice Statistics (2002) indicate that one-quarter of convicted property and drug offenders commit their crimes to get money for drugs. NIDA research also ties drug use to several other felony convictions, including money laundering, grand theft, and counterfeiting.


While a majority of drug-related crimes can be attributed to the illegality of drugs themselves, research shows that a majority of criminal acts are carried out by persons acting under the influence of or in the pursuit of many types of illicit drugs. That said, the relationship between drugs and crime remains extremely difficult to determine from a research perspective and remains a topic of debate among criminologists and sociologists.




Youth-Oriented Prevention

Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies have developed numerous systems and processes aimed at reducing the appeal of drug use in hopes of simultaneously halting the various criminal activities that accompany that use. Aimed largely at school-age children and young adults, the agencies’ primary goals have been to prevent persons from entering into the culture of drugs. These programs, which involve coursework and demonstrations of the negative aspects of drug use, have met with varying degrees of success.



The Drug Abuse Resistance Education program (D.A.R.E.) is an example of a failed nationwide effort to curtail drug use and violence. Founded in 1983 by former Los Angeles Police Department chief Daryl Gates, the program was widely utilized in public schools in the United States to explicitly educate young people on the dangers of drug use and activity through lecture-style lessons, drug identification demonstrations, and attempts at building trusting relationships with local police officers through in-school interactions.


By the late 1990s research began to show that the D.A.R.E. program not only was ineffective in decreasing drug use in the majority of communities in which it was utilized but also contributed to a rise in alcohol and drug use among its participants. Evaluation studies demonstrating the program’s ineffectiveness were made by several federal agencies, including the US Office of the Surgeon General and US Department of Education (DE). The program’s widespread reputation for ineffectiveness led the DE to prohibit schools from utilizing federal funds for the program in 1998.


New strategies fostered by the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign in online campaigns, such as TheAntiDrug.com and AboveTheInfluence.com, detract from the communal, schoolroom-oriented strategies of previous programs like D.A.R.E.. The AntiDrug.com program emphasizes positive parental influence as a crucial dissuasion from the temptations of drug-related activity, while AbovetheInfluence.com seeks to tear down the status of illegal drug use as a popular counterculture.




Bibliography


"Alcohol, Drugs and Crime." National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence. NCADD, 27 June 2015. Web. 29 Oct. 2015.



Andrews, D. A. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Cincinnati: Anderson, 2010. Print.



Belenko, Steven, and Cassia Spohn. Drugs, Crime, and Justice. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2015. Print.



Galanter, Mark, ed. Alcoholism and Violence: Epidemiology, Neurobiology, Psychology, Family Issues. Recent Developments in Alcoholism 13. New York: Springer, 1997. Print.



Galvin, Emily V. "How Treatment Courts Can Reduce Crime." Atlantic. Atlantic Monthly, 29 Sept. 2015. Web. 29 Oct. 2015.



Hammersley, Richard. Drugs and Crime. London: Polity, 2008. Print.



Hanson, Glen, Peter J. Venturelli, and Annette E. Fleckenstein. Drugs and Society. 11th ed. Sudbury: Jones, 2012. Print.



US Department of Justice. “The Systems Approach to Crime and Drug Prevention: A Path to Community Policing.” Bulletin—Bureau of Justice Assistance 1.2 (Sept. 1993). PDF file.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How does the choice of details set the tone of the sermon?

Edwards is remembered for his choice of details, particularly in this classic sermon. His goal was not to tell people about his beliefs; he ...