Krakauer has a number of reasons to write Into the Wild. In the Author's Note in the Anchor Books edition, Krakauer lists a few: he is interested in the "grip wilderness has on the American imagination," in the allure of high risk activities, and in the "highly charged bonds between fathers and sons." At bottom, I think Krakauer writes the book to try to understand why McCandless did what he did, and to describe the volitile mixture of extreme self confidence, practical skill, and rampant Romanticism that made McCandless the person he was. But mostly, I think, Krakauer is drawn to McCandless's story because he sees something of himself in Chris. McCandless was a person who had a dream and followed it to the end. So in a way, writing McCandless's biography is a kind of inside way for Krakauer to write about his own need for the wild. Perhaps the book is an expression of Krakauer's own dream.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How does the choice of details set the tone of the sermon?
Edwards is remembered for his choice of details, particularly in this classic sermon. His goal was not to tell people about his beliefs; he ...
-
“Ravens” is told from the perspective of a parent explaining the death of a newborn lamb to his or her child. A raven first makes its appea...
-
Framton Nuttel is a complete bore. He has come out to the country to get away from anything strenuous. After hearing Vera's dramatic and...
-
In my answer to this question, I will discuss both sides of the issue where that seems useful. One the one hand, you can say that the store ...
No comments:
Post a Comment